Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Beaver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Beaver[edit]

This is a contested {{nn-bio}} by the author. The author believes that this artist is notable, and there is perhaps an asserion of notability in winning the "East Lincon High Technology award". Since A7s are for more or less uncontested issues, I am bringing this here for full AFD discussion. No vote. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BIO. A7 should apply; a high school award does not assert notability, in my view. PJM 12:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete {{db-bio}} Non-notable biography, deleted once already. (aeropagitica) 12:50, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and make it speedy. --Deville (Talk) 13:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Question: (aeropagitica) said that this has been deleted once already. When was that? Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answer My mistake. I tagged it with {{nn-bio}} earlier and noticed that it had gone from the CSD candidates page. From the page history, it looks like the tag was removed, hence the AfD nomination. I see no reason why it couldn't be speedied, being a non-notable biography. (aeropagitica) 15:35, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; I've no problem with the quality of the art, but that alone doesn't make the author notable, and nothing else in the article convinces me of this. Fourohfour 17:18, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I tagged this as nn-bio; I stand by my tagging. Zetawoof^(ζ) 20:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Ugur Basak 21:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Someone claimed on his user talk page that he was notable. I asked him to show why he was notable as the reasons given did not establish notability. If the article wasn't improved, I was going to speedy it if another admin didn't beat me to it. I got distracted by work on another article and didn't get back to it. The work hasn't been done so delete possible speedy. Capitalistroadster 01:56, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.