Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christophe Aubanel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle (talk) 02:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Christophe Aubanel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found no sources. Fails WP:V. BLP PROD declined as an article created before 2010. CoolSkittle (talk) 02:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannyniu (talk • contribs) 02:19, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom.TH1980 (talk) 02:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:23, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:23, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:23, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:NFOOTY, WP:GNG. Sources include [1], [2], [3], and the unfortunate [4]. SportingFlyer T·C 05:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - player comfortably meets WP:NFOOTY having played over 150 times in Ligue 2, a fully professional league. [5] Kosack (talk) 05:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Easily passes WP:NFOOTBALL there are sources out there, has played way enough professional football to qualify for an article regardless of its poor quality. Also the nominator should of had a look at the French wikipedia page and would of seen the difference to know this player passes the guideline instead of wasting peoples time with this AfD. Govvy (talk) 09:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as above, clearly passes WP:NFOOTBALL and likely passes GNG even with a quick search. Giant Snowman 09:47, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - footballer who appeared in 178 league matches over 8 seasons in the fully-pro Ligue 2. There is online coverage of him in Le Parisien: [6], [7]; and Le Télégramme: [8], [9]. I think the article can pass WP:GNG with some translation help. Jogurney (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:FOOTY.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pro footballer plus the drug conviction (not that the latter puts him over the top) show this should be retained. THEFlint Shrubwood (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG, per all above. Ejgreen77 (talk) 19:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes WP:NFOOTY. -- Dane ^talk 02:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.