Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Cash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fred Figglehorn. — Jake Wartenberg 00:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas Cash[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wholly non-notable web content/music. --EEMIV (talk) 00:06, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to Fred Figglehorn. No notability unto itself. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Fred Figglehorn. C'mon seriously? --Dan Leveille^TALK 06:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect. Likely search term, given the artist's popularity in certain circles. Drmies (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well spoken, you closet fan.--Milowent (talk) 16:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch! Mama, Milowent is being mean! Drmies (talk) 16:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heehee. Currently this song is #34 on itunes music video chart. Will it be another (Do You Wanna Date My) Avatar?--Milowent (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Milowent, you are obviously a young person with nothing better to do or an older person who is disregarding their duties. How do you know this stuff? Don't tell me you actually care... Drmies (talk) 04:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, its a long sordid story involving children who love fred and a supposed adult who still tries to crack jokes about Mahir Çağrı --Milowent (talk) 04:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - I know Fred Figglehorn is YouTube's #2 most subscribed and all, but I think this album isn't very notable, and songs for a non-notable album would be pretty failish... Jeremjay 24 23:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and set redirect without prejudice toward recreation as an individual article at a future date. Interestingly enough, the Christmas Cash video IS getting independent coverage... though yes, currently this in connection with Lucas Cruikshank (Fred) and his other works. Worth noting as well is that it first aired on November 10 and within 6 days received nearly 1.5 million views. Quite impressive, actually, as the song (and article) are only days old. As it receives more coverage, an independent notability may be easier to assert and cite. NOTE: I am declaring a COI, as I had the role of Santa in the video. Though offfering a (hopefully) neutral opinion here, I will not be touching any Fred articles that include my acting. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, you're kidding right? Drmies would have killed for that role! --Milowent (talk) 21:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Not kidding. Though I'd never heard of Lucas Cruikshank or Fred's Channel before the booking, on set, I found Lucas to be well-mannered, well-gounded, quiet fellow... quite the opposite of his Fred alter-ego. Then researching before commenting at this AFD, I found that Christmas Cash might quite soon qualify as individualy notable per WP:GNG [1], [2], [3]... which is why my own thought is toward no prejudice toward recreation by someone. Its coverage is growing daily. But do you really think Drmies could have fit in my Santa Suit? Ho ho ho. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.