Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Robbins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:05, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Robbins[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Seems to be a family biography. Natureium (talk) 03:04, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable BLP. Written in an alarmingly personal style, which might indicate the author is a family member as Natureium suggested. Nanophosis (talk) 04:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 04:58, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 04:58, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The cited sources all either 1) based on an interview of unknown provenance, (possibly with the article's author?) and almost certainly not fact-checked or subject to editorial control, 2) do not mention Robbins, or 3) are explicitly labeled as by the author, and thus OR. MarginalCost (talk) 05:03, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I just came across another one of these articles on a non-notable veteran. Serving in the military is not a default sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:52, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I found a number of more notable people name "Christine Robbins" in my BEFORE. This particular individual seems to have given an interview, and this glowing bio of a Wikipedia article was written about her.Icewhiz (talk) 12:01, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wildly fails NOT, NPOV, V, and NOR. I could imagine an encyclopedic article written about many people, but I don't see turning this one into such an article without a major effort, finding sources I couldn't find, and more. Smmurphy^(Talk) 16:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable at all for stand alone article. Not even trivia of a regional nature; more like a family history blog. Kierzek (talk) 16:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 02:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.