Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian W. Chandler
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as requested by the author. —Soap— 00:50, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Christian W. Chandler[edit]
- Christian W. Chandler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Still not anywhere near being notable. See previous AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Weston Chandler. The title of this article is different because the old title, and many variants thereof, is salted. I would have simply deleted the article directly as a recreation of AfD'd material, but this new version is significantly different from the old and I could be seen as having a conflict of interest since I've been cleaning up Sonichu-related vandalism for a while now. If kept, I see this article turning into a coatrack documenting all of the embarrassing things Chandler has done, with the biographical information at the beginning used as just an excuse to justify the article's existence. If deleted, it would become near-impossible for anyone to justify recreating the article yet again. —Soap— 23:23, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Gyrobo (talk) 23:46, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy as article creator. I have no intentions of embarrassing Chandler by creating this article, and if it is to be deleted and my comment ingored, I only ask that this article name is not salted just because of the abuse people from 4chan or ED or whatever cause him. Getting over the issues presented by Soap, the article can have a fighting chance, I just need the time to ensure it. The Thunderkitty (talk) 00:00, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and salt Article creator has no previous edits and is most likely a troll here to wreak more havoc on Chris. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record, I am working on another article relating to a band called Crush 40. Another thing is that if you take a look at the ED variation of the article, they have talked about him so much that it needed a subpage navigation template due to the limitation of the article size, and Cogsdev while writing in the view of a troll, has over 1,000 articles relating to Chris. If the community of Wikipedia wasn't so taboo to the stunts 4chan or ED has done, this article would more than likely be a featured article, I can assure you of that fact. The Thunderkitty (talk) 00:24, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not change other people's votes. Or anything else they write on a discussion page, for that matter. —Soap— 00:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Being I am the only person making substantual edits, I have requested speedy deletion and blanked the article as a courtesy. The Thunderkitty (talk) 00:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not change other people's votes. Or anything else they write on a discussion page, for that matter. —Soap— 00:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record, I am working on another article relating to a band called Crush 40. Another thing is that if you take a look at the ED variation of the article, they have talked about him so much that it needed a subpage navigation template due to the limitation of the article size, and Cogsdev while writing in the view of a troll, has over 1,000 articles relating to Chris. If the community of Wikipedia wasn't so taboo to the stunts 4chan or ED has done, this article would more than likely be a featured article, I can assure you of that fact. The Thunderkitty (talk) 00:24, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.