Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Exodus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Exodus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia's policies state "The significance of an event or individual is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources." This organization is insignificant in that it lasted a very short time, ceased to exist in 2008, and there has been no coverage in reliable sources since 2007. Other than generate some news articles, it did absolutely nothing. Notability policies also state "brief bursts of news coverage may not be sufficient signs of notability, while sustained coverage would be...." There certainly has been no sustained coverage of this organization and it rightly can be considered a brief flash in the plan. It is not notable. JimTwiki (talk) 18:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- As I read it, this was a small organization with big plans, from which it achieved little - the relocation of 15 families. That strikes me as a classic case of NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete User:Peterkingiron pegs it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete until this can be improved. SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.