Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Catholic Apostolic Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus, leaning to keep. Mailer Diablo 17:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Catholic Apostolic Church[edit]

An article about an nn church or religion, it doesn't quite say. Contains no information about why this sect is in any way founded, or if it has any contemporaries or current following, only that it was founded. It only gets 235 Google hits, of which Wikipedia is the first. Páll ^{(Die pienk olifant)} 05:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. This sect was founded in 1896, and has 3,000 members according to the Columbia Encyclopedia, which obviously considers it notable.--Pharos 06:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The fact they may get a better write-up elsewhere doesn't improve the nn here.Tychocat 10:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if its good enough for a paper encyclopædia it sure as hell is for here. Jcuk 11:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable church with its long history, definitely notable. --Ter e nc e Ong 13:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep tychochat that is rubbish, the fact that it has a better write up elsewhere MEANS that it is notable here! THE KING 13:11, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems notable to me, though it may have had more relevance in the past than now. --Ed (Edgar181) 13:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Keep either needs more meat, or else should be merged into John Alexander Dowie. Crum375 19:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Expand within five days - delete if not so done. There is more information in this discussion than in the one-sentence "stub." B.Wind 21:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.