Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Watson (Texas musician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Watson (Texas musician)[edit]

Chris Watson (Texas musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced fanpage, promotional in tone, no evidence of notability. He doesn't acquire notability from those he has "the pleasure of sharing the stage with". Twice nominated for speedy, but contested by a third party. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. Probably WP:TOOSOON. The complete lack of any sourcing is a threshhold problem; this article is potentially deletable under WP:BLPPROD. Assuming we're talking about the Chris Watson whose band has the website http://www.chriswatsonband.com/, the website's press page offers a few things that might qualify, if marginally, including Rock Over America, Blues Underground Network, a concert review at DFW.com, and a couple of others that look more like blogs, but I'm not sure. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:14, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. The best coverage, in my view, appears to be two local write-ups; I'm not convinced that's enough to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC.  Gongshow   talk 07:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.