Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Thomson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete (WP:SNOW applies fine in this case). --Angelo (talk) 11:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chris Thomson[edit]
- Chris Thomson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Disputed prod, no assertion of notability per WP:BIO, no references, not a lot to go on as to why this should be in Wikipedia. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BIO. Absolutely nothing on google to show he has played a game. Peanut4 (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He is not named in the official squad and there is little evidence that he even exists. --neonwhite user page talk 19:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He fails WP:BIO, isn't on a major team and hasn't played a game yet. Hatmatbbat10,a proud Wikipedian (Talk) 19:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all the above. пﮟოьεԻ 57 19:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it's contradictory to say that he plays for a team yet he's never played. Contract problems mean he doesn't even have a contract to play in the future. For now, it seems as though this is an article written by the subject himself (Chrisfdwc2008 (talk · contribs)) and he's maybe in the process of negotiating with the team. Non-notable. SWik78 (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, not verifiable. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. D.M.N. (talk) 21:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and thanks to the creator for wasting everybody's time in creating it. Robotforaday (talk) 21:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-per nom and per what is above.TrUCo9311 22:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Let it snow! Let it snow! Let it snow! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.