Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Moss Acid (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Moss Acid[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a custom Google search of reliable music sources. Its current (refbombed) sources are all passing mentions or plainly unreliable. None are in depth with enough content to write a sourced article on the subject. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 14:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar 14:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this seems enough for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article mentions reviews from Igloomag.com, and I found two: [1] and [2]. However, I think it's probably too soon for an article. I think igloomag.com may be reliable, and he's certainly got a lot of trivial mentions scattered around reliable sources, but this doesn't quite add up to significant coverage yet. Sending the article to draft space is a credible alternative. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.