Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Low

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Low[edit]

Chris Low (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable - fails WP:NHOCKEY guidelines, his professional career was only within minor leagues. PKT(alk) 14:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. PKT(alk) 14:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. PKT(alk) 14:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY. Flibirigit (talk) 15:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • 20 Mule-Team Delete: A fringe third- and fourth-liner in the low minors, there's never been any version of NHOCKEY he'd come remotely close to meeting. The creation of a SPA whose sole Wikipedia edit was creating this article, and it's sad it took us eight years to catch up to it. Ravenswing 22:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NHOCKEY SportingFlyer (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - dare I suggest a speedy delete? ....PKT(alk) 01:54, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's best to let the AFD process take its course, as there are no criteria met for speedy deletion. Flibirigit (talk) 02:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Doesn't meet speedy criteria at all since it claims notability by stating he played on pro teams. -DJSasso (talk) 12:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails NHOCKEY and GNG. Rlendog (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No significant coverage and doesn't come close to meeting any notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.