Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris King (serial entrepreneur)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 19:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chris King (serial entrepreneur)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, and previously tagged by another user as such. Seems the only thing worth nothing about the guy is that he spends money on lots of different projects. None of which seem to be notable in their own right either. As it's written it looks like a "look at me I spent money on each of these projects" bio. Caffeyw (talk) 09:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. His projects do not seem notable, and neither does he. "Chris King Group" gets no worthwhile hits on Google News, for example. "Eco Dog Planet" gets no hits. Seems like self-promotion to me. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not quite G11, but the purpose of the article is obviously to promote his importance, and there's not enough substantial content to rewrite. Enghaging in multiple less than notable activities does not make for notability . DGG ( talk ) 00:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. jni (talk) 07:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Tomas e (talk) 16:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.