Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Jarman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was that the subject passes WP:NACTOR. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 19:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Jarman[edit]

Chris Jarman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor performer; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. Article was originally proposed for deletion, but deprodded. References provided by user who deprodded are reviews of productions that only mention Jarman, none provide significant coverage. -- Wikipedical (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As I said in my reason for removing the PROD, "it is clear from the list of stage roles he has played in the West End that he meets WP:NACTOR." WP:NACTOR#1 states "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." It does not state, as WP:AUTHOR does, "In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series ...) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Jarman has clearly had multiple significant roles in multiple notable productions. The article is a stub, and could certainly do with expansion, but there is no doubt that he is notable. RebeccaGreen (talk) 17:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Meets WP:NACTOR#1 as he has had major roles in multiple West End productions.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Meets NACTOR.--PATH SLOPU 13:43, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, Meets WP:NACTOR for the roles he has had in some major productions. Alex-h (talk) 10:13, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.