Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Edge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. لenna vecia 16:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Edge[edit]

Previously prodded by another user with reasoning "A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Chris Edge – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability." and I agree. Prod removed by yet another serial deprodding account for no reason. Quick look at article shows no reliable sources at all (just IMDB listing) and nothing like an argument that would demonstrate notability (shows have lots of writers, they need something more to be worth mentioning). DreamGuy (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - sources do not establish notability; there is a lack of significant content. There is even a lack of a credible claim of significance or importance, "provided material for a significant/notable show", is akin to saying a person worked as an employee for a notable company, this is borderline CSD A7 material. --Mysidia (talk) 01:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find anything to indicate notability. Looks like a 'oh look, I've got my own wikipedia' page. Fuzbaby (talk) 01:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity page with no particular claim to notability given. Gigs (talk) 02:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above, and per the complete lack of hits in Google News--certainly a notable person famous for a post-stone age show would appear at least once. Drmies (talk) 03:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.