Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris DiSalvatore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chris DiSalvatore[edit]

Unnotable everyday person whose only claim to fame was to boast he was listed in a Marquis Who's Who volume, and whose original author (who may have created this iteration of the article under a new account) was warned for inserting libelous information about WFLA-TV personalities; this page was subsequently A7'ed on September 10, 2008 after its discovery, but here it is in recreated form. I would also not doubt WP:COPYVIO applies here. Nate • (chatter) 10:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The article is clearly not notable upon verification.--Ped Admi (talk) 01:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I don't think we're going to create articles on all 100,000 people listed in this source, and this person doesn't seem to stand above the rest in terms of notability. Marquis Who's Who seems to be geared more towards inclusivity than selecting only those people who are important for some reason or another. JulesH (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep or at least properly investigate. The various publications differ in their standards. WW in Science and Engineering, and the regional WWs, are pretty low; WW in the World is usually about people who do turn out to be notable if looked at. DGG (talk) 00:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.