Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Agee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The single Irish Times review does not show "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" , as is eloquently explained by Wikipeterproject Kevin (talk) 23:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Agee[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this author. Joe Chill (talk) 22:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Borderline speedy (no assertion of notability). I don't think that authoring books is a de facto claim to notability. Pburka (talk) 23:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep~~Delete~~. Additional reference in discussion below make me convinced of "keep". However, contrary to Pburka, there is a definite claim of notability in his 3 poetry books. They simply fall below a sufficiently wide reception (at least as evidenced) to warrant a keep. LotLE×talk 08:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per anthology, and review in Irish Times, (article much improved since nomination.) Pohick2 (talk) 01:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- One source with significant coverage doesn't show notability. Joe Chill (talk) 01:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- - comment (i found 1 source); anthology? Pohick2 (talk) 22:46, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:53, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep An entry in the International Who's Who in Poetry and Poets' Encyclopaedia (p. 6, see Google Books) should be sufficient for inclusion, in my opinion. It is possible to find more: [1], [2], [3]. --Vejvančický (talk) 11:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As a poet, WP:CREATIVE applies. The rather stringent notability requirements for creative professionals, including poets, requires that the individual is "regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors", "has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" or "The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention..." The provided references do not support this in any way. Biographies on publishers' websites are not independent, the newspaper articles do not really reference or cite his work and blogspots are generally considered trivial sources. There is no evidence that Agee is widely cited by peers or successors. Wikipeterproject (talk) 19:17, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipeterproject. JBsupreme (talk) 19:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.