Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chorki (streaming service)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chorki (streaming service)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic does not meet WP:GNG requirements. Note The Daily Star and Prothom Alo are sister concerns and references to those sites should be taken as evidence of notability. Most of the references are the press releases and not the in-depth coverage needed for the subject. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 07:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 07:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 07:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 07:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 07:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this one easily passes WP:GNG. Even if I avoid Daily Star and Prothom Alo, there are enough indepth coverage on Channel i, Daily Ittefaq and many more. Contents of this OTT are regularly featured by media outlets. These are not press releases. Press releases tend to have the same text, word for word, from different media outlets which is not the case here. --Zayeem ^(talk) 07:59, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 05:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources in article clearly shows passes WP:GNG. Ginbopewz (talk) 12:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.