Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolate activism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 19:44, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Chocolate activism[edit]
- Chocolate activism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An IP motioned for delete on the talk page: "this article should be deleted because it may not be able to be attributed to reliable sources, and may not be notable" Commander Keane (talk) 01:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a quick Google search didn't turn up any uses of the term "chocolate activism" in the manner described in the article. May be an attempted neologism. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per Andrew's reasoning, and stub, noref, and not notable. Phuzion (talk) 03:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I concur looks like a case of neologism. -Marcusmax(speak) 03:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and subsequent comments. the phrase is simply not used. an article on selling chocolate in this manner could be written, but this stub and its name would not be necessary or helpful.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I engineered an advanced Google search which came up with 379 results, mostly non-related and nothing determining notability or verifiability. Others seem like tranclusions from Wikipedia like this amazing essay.--NortyNort (Holla) 13:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. JeremyMcClean (talk) 18:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Non-Notable Neologism. Mmmmmmmmm, chocolate! Carrite (talk) 01:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.