Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinpa Tenpel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chinpa Tenpel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, not notable, overlooked for a whole year. The corresponding entry at the Dutch Wikipedia (usually more lenient) was immediately deleted (see discussion in Dutch). A process here was announced but never started. gidonb (talk) 21:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment All former editors have been notified about this procedure. gidonb (talk) 02:16, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, this is an unreferenced BLP article and, as such, must be deleted.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:49, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Right, there is no case for keeping this article. gidonb (talk) 21:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing found to meet WP:BASIC notability.--Ben Ben (talk) 07:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.