Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Wit, Wisdom, and Written Characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Wit, Wisdom, and Written Characters[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. The only source in the article, AbeBooks, is not an acceptable reliable source. A Google search found no sources. Google Books and Google Scholar dig up some results, but they are only references or short mentions. Mucube (talk • contribs) 23:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Mucube (talk • contribs) 23:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm seeing non-trivial coverage, including book reviews, in newspapers: Chicago Tribune, The Age, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, The Los Angeles Times. Seems like enough to pass WP:NBOOK. Sorry those links are paywalled; if you're interested, you can request access via WP:The Wikipedia Library. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a WP:BEFORE shows sources from reliable sources. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 09:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on WP:BEFORE and WP:POTENTIAL. Sources appear to exist. Archrogue (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Paywalled sources are good. BruceThomson (talk) 02:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.