Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinabounder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No Notability asserted Black Kite 00:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chinabounder[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability having only received trivial coverage from respected secondary sources. MMAJunkie250 (talk) 21:58, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep,an internet phenomena in China.--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 02:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Nothing to suggest that he is notable enough for his own article. His blog has only 500,000 hits in a 4 year period and the most talk I can find of him is through obscure blogs. I would expect an interent phenomena to have more hits and more publicity. It only looks like a blog that created some controvesy among a few groups and nothing more.BearShare998 (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails notability criteria unless Wikiepdia's standards have fallen dangerously since the last time I went on. Bipartisan185 (talk) 19:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also the article is very poorly sourced. Bipartisan185 (talk) 19:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Looks like only semi successful blogger, no where as sucessful as many others. 151.151.21.100 (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Could be interesting by the looks of it. He seems to expose some serious social issues in China, apart from the tales of sex. Colipon+(Talk) 12:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It may be interesting but that's not enough to justify a Wikipedia article. MMAJunkie250 (talk) 20:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.