Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Spy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy to User:Garbolia/China Spy. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

China Spy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Future non-notable film that has not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography. Appears to fail WP:NFF. ttonyb (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My point of views are:1. Here are examples of all the upcoming films and 2011 films, most of movies are Future non-notable film before or even during filming and post production, and non of the 2011 films has principal photography yet. My question is that, should we delete the category of 2011 films and all the titles on wikipedia until they start to film and having principal photography? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Upcoming_films The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 569 total. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:2011_films The following 12 pages are in this category, out of 12 total.2. China Spy movie 's production company successfully produced feature film Empress Vampire. If a company had the ability and experience to produce a decent feature film and submit to Cannes, it is logical that they will also have the ability to produce another feature film and will not fail before filming.Thank you.--Garbolia (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy to be moved into articlespace when more appropriate. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My suggestion is: to be justice, remove all new movie titles planned filming on 2010 and beyond 2011 from wiki, because it is impossible for any of these movies to have principle production work at this time. I would lost justice if only remove one or two of them. Or there should have a rule special for that on wiki admin, so no one would even consider to work on these kind of articles.--Garbolia (talk) 01:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Let's focus on the issue at hand and the reason for this AfD. Specifically, does this article meet the criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia. I know it is tempting to refer to other articles as justification for keeping or deleting this article, but each article needs to stand on it's own merits. Unfortunately I have seen no justification for inclusion. If this changes, this article can recreated when it meets Wikipedia criteria for inclusion. ttonyb (talk) 03:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy to author with our thanks, for the article is a decently enough written stub even though premature. There's no need to make him recreate all his work, when it can sit nicely out of the way and be improved as more sources become available. Allow return without prejudice when WP:NFF can be properly met. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Incubate or userfy, per MQS. Tim Song (talk) 03:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.