Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Resources Building (Hong Kong)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus due to limited participation. (WP:NPASR). However, a merge discussion can continue on an article talk page, or perhaps just be boldly performed. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:43, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

China Resources Building (Hong Kong)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable office building. No significant article content (Wikipedia is not a directory). Plenty of passing mentions on listings websites but no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Can be merged with the China Resources Enterprise article in a new section. Similar article created by the same author deleted in March. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Philg88 ^♦talk 04:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Multiple sources can be found.For example [1][2][3].I'm not sure whether they are independent of the subject.Actually,they do in Chinese wiki.--180.155.69.97 (talk) 04:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The references are acceptable for verification and will provide about a paragraph of text - I have reworded the submission to clarify that this is merge proposal. Philg88 ^♦talk 16:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to China Resources Enterprise per nom. SW3 5DL (talk) 04:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.