Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of Steel (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Edguy#Discography. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Children of Steel (album)[edit]

Children of Steel (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable demo. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A demo album by Edguy. I think it is not notable. I couldn't find anything besides download sites, blogs, lyrics sites, Youtube videos and databases. No evidence of notability. The article is sourced to the unreliable Metal Archives only. That is never a good sign either. The page also has a notability and an improve references tag since 2013. Non-notable release. Edguy is a notable band but not everything they release is notable. (That goes to any band by the way, not just Edguy.) GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It should be deleted. I did not find any notable source.Ahmetlii (talk) 17:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Like I suggested for Evil Minded, redirect to Edguy#Discography since it looks more like a database entry than an actual encyclopedic article, not to mention that the only source is unreliable. And like I also said in the other nomination page, both demos could have been jointly nominated, since the reasoning is the same and the topics are closely connected. Victor Lopes Fala!C 21:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.