Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's programming on The WB, UPN and The CW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Children's programming on The WB, UPN and The CW[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page has been draftified twice and restored to mainspace by the article creator without improvement. Taking to AfD for review per WP:DRAFTOBJECT. The article strikes me as a non-encyclopedic cross-categorization. Why is children's programming on The WB, UPN, and The CW grouped together, excluding children's programming on other television networks? I am certainly not able to find any sources that discuss children's programming on these networks as a set. I'm not sure if the article is intended to be a simple list since all sections are currently blank, but I don't see any potential for it to meet WP:LISTN/WP:GNG. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify, or delete No idea if there's a valid reason to group these networks together, but the article does not contain any list information as of writing and is unsuitable for the article space at its current state. RoseCherry64 (talk) 18:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is unclear and has encyclopedic value. Louie (talk) 16:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: It is not clear what the page creator intended to do. There is no need to create sections for each and every program, instead of a list. It also does not meet wikipedia's quality standards. ― Itcouldbepossible^Talk 14:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.