Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's Theater of Charlotte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was to keep the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paranormal Skeptic (talk • contribs) 12 June 2009

Children's Theater of Charlotte[edit]

Nothing notable found on Google News to support inclusion. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 22:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep it's mostly a copyvio, but there's enough from Google to show it may be notable StarM 00:57, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 01:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As a 50-year organisation, it should not be so quickly judged to be merely promotional. This reference [1] is a good start. Wikipedia should not be developed as a subset of the material findable through google news, or any other search engine. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Been around for 61 years, and is seen by 320,000 a year. Notable, obviously. Dream Focus 03:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of reliable sources readily available like these news articles, these books and yes, these scholar Ghits. -- Banjeboi 04:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Apparently, the organization is called "Children’s Theatre of Charlotte", not "Children's Theater of Charlotte". If this is true, the content needs to be moved and and the current page needs to be directed to Children’s Theatre of Charlotte. Google News seems to indicate sufficient notability[2][3][4]. — Rankiri (talk) 17:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.