Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child Work

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to child labour. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Child Work[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I approved this from AFC because I don't think it's undeniably deletion-worthy, but I think it should be deleted as an essay nonetheless. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:15, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article Child labour already exists. This one is indeed an essay rather than an encyclopedia article. The creator should be encouraged to contribute to the existing article if he/she has material that is not included there. LaMona (talk) 21:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Child labour. Unnecessary duplicate article. Pax
Merge duplicate selectively to child labour. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.