Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chihiro Hasegawa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chihiro Hasegawa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, commercial websites, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:02, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree with nom, the sources (while botched in their own right) and not independent of the subject matter nor reliable. Considering the subject matter, this seems to be a BLP violation. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete being in lots of non-notable videos does not make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to have lot's of proper references, and I think having done over 100 porn videos makes this person notable in the industry she is in, maybe she is not a famous person but we need to look at it as a niche. Expertwikiguy (talk) 18:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as No evidence of notability, hasnt won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 18:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.