Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiesa Nuova (Chicago)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Noting that the sources offered by Sv72 are about places in Italy and not the organisation in Chicago that is the topic of the article. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chiesa Nuova (Chicago)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN ministry, fails the GNG and WP:ORG. Zero coverage in reliable, independent sources found (the ones that are out there pertain to the parish in Italy). Notability tagged for over a decade.

Deprodded with the rationale "I am going to WP:AGF on the offline sources presented." Of the two in the article, one is the official newspaper of the archdiocese, and therefore a primary source ineligible to support notability, and the second is a monthly neighborhood newspaper where the subject does not turn up on their website searches. Ravenswing 22:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 22:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 22:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 22:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article lacks the depth of sources for notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The sourcing in the article, although offline and not accessible to me, is not sufficient to establish notability. As pointed out by the nominator, the official newspaper of the archdicoese is not independent. And an article in a community newspaper is not going to be useful for contributing to notability. My own searches do not turn up coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 13:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Have sufficient sources available on google, should not be deleted.Sv72 (talk) 00:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC) — Sv72 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Reply: Glad to hear it. Would you care to identify which specific sources you believe gives the subject the "significant coverage" required by the GNG? Ravenswing 00:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sure check these links out, you will come to know about what Significant Coverage I am talking about, Thanks (https://www.tg24.info/sora-chiesa-nuova-pulizia-a-meta-la-denuncia-di-una-cittadina/), (https://www.techno-science.net/glossaire-definition/Chiesa-Nuova.html), (https://www.rietinvetrina.it/chiesa-nuova-a-fuoco-un-fienile-colonna-di-fumo-ben-visibile-anche-da-viale-matteucci/) these are few of them, there are others too. Sv72 (talk) 01:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you actually read these sources you offered up? They have nothing to do with the topic of this article. -- Whpq (talk) 01:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. That's why I pointed out the similarly named parish in Italy in my nomination. One might reasonably imagine that a parish in Chicago is extremely unlikely to receive coverage in Italian sources. Ravenswing 12:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also unable to find any WP:SIGCOV here. Paradox society 08:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.