Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief Minister of Rajasthan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep since article has been rewritten in English. Kusma (討論) 22:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chief Minister of Rajasthan[edit]

From Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English, untranslated after two weeks. Discussion from there follows. It also looks like there was a text coding error. No vote. Kusma (討論) 00:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hindi? Urdu? Anyway... short article which may or may not be notable... Deiz 00:10, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting from wrong subsection. Kusma (討論) 21:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 02:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless it is translated before the close of the debate. Would vote to keep article in English. Keep as rewritten by MLA.Capitalistroadster 02:59, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Capitalistroadster. Mgm|^(talk) 11:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep shouldn't be too hard to get rid of what's there and turn it into an English stub. MLA 15:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have edited the page to turn it into a very short stub. Chief Minister of Rajasthan seems like a notable political position and so should have an article here. The previous version was not any good but hopefully it can be turned into something that does work. MLA 15:52, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Keep the new stub of course. Thanks for your research. Kusma (討論) 16:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the stub. Good work to MLA for the translation.--み使い Mitsukai 18:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Hopefully someone can expand. Treznor 21:40, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep now after MLA's revision. --Lockley 22:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.