Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken Scramble

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chicken Scramble[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The1337gamer (talk) 09:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 09:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A weak delete from me; there is significant coverage at Engadget. Didn't see anything else in the VG/RS search. One source might not be good enough. --Izno (talk) 02:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I see nothing obviously better. Pinging tagger Varnent. SwisterTwister talk 05:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There might be references in Chinese sources, but I can't find anything on the searches which shows the notability of this. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete - non-notable. DangerDogWest (talk) 04:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.