Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken Park
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus, I'm going out on a limb a bit here; it has an article on the Italian sub-domain, and their article has more blue links, so there is a good chance this will grow in time. Another discussion on this in a few months will probably be necessary. John Vandenberg (talk)
Chicken Park[edit]
This film fails our notability criteria for films. This article is also a borderline attack page. Prod removed without comment by creator. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 03:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SpeedydeleteCSD G4 recreation of deleted material.As non notable. Sting au Buzz Me... 04:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Speedy Delete per G4.Undeath (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This article has not been deleted previously via deletion discussion, which makes it ineligible for speedy deletion under the G4 criterion. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No not AfD but speedied. [1] Sting au Buzz Me... 06:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, that's what I meant (sorry if I was unclear). It's ineligible as a G4 because it was speedied. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 06:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh ok? I thought speedys were included in that section. My bad. I'll change to delete as nn. Sting au Buzz Me... 06:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, that's what I meant (sorry if I was unclear). It's ineligible as a G4 because it was speedied. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 06:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No not AfD but speedied. [1] Sting au Buzz Me... 06:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm actually going to try to save this page, as I found a few items on this movie. I'll be adding to the page, but if it is deleted, so be it. Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I also noted that there is an article on this same movie on the Italian Wikipedia [2]. I've added an infobox, and removed the borderline personal attack. Unfortunately I can't find a lot of info on this movie however other than IMDB. Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The IMDb might just be enough? According to WP:MOVIE where there it states, "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." In the Resources section IMBd is listed as an accepted source. I'd still like to see this page ref improved though? Or maybe film stub it and just go with the IMBd reference? I'm swaying towards keep now. Try and convince me. Sting au Buzz Me... 22:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.