Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken Kiev Parmigiana (Karma)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 01:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chicken Kiev Parmigiana (Karma)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability.
Article itself claims that it was invented in 2010, so it's not likely to have become notable yet.
Google search finds no references to this name except some Wikipedia mirrors

--Macrakis (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article does not argue that the topic is notable, and none of the included sources are sufficient for it to pass WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--based on the article (and the dearth of any outside sources for this invented recipe in a Google search) this appears to be, literally, WP:MADEUP.--Arxiloxos (talk) 07:13, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Does look made up. No ghits to speak of. -- Alexf^(talk) 13:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Non-notable, looks a bit of made up too. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article references Wikipedia, the only non-Wikipedia reference is in Russian. --Confession0791 ^talk 05:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with the source being in Russian. More to the point is the fact that it is about the very notable Chicken Kiev rather than the dish described in this article. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
English Wikipedia should link to English sources. --Confession0791 ^talk 23:40, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So should Manx Wikipedia be restricted to subjects covered by reliable sources in Manx? Phil Bridger (talk) 00:24, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose the concept that "English Wikipedia should link to English sources", but Delete the article on the non-notable dish. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 05:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.