Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago reggae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 10:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago_reggae[edit]

Non notability; almost every major city contains proponents of several popular genre's of music. Aside from a single appearance by Bob Marley in the late 70's (which is apparently not notable enough to garner it's own article) no effort is made to indicate why Reggae music in or from Chicago is noteworthy. Jesse (talk) 13:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 13:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nominator's arguments. Without significant corroboration in secondary sources, I don't see the required notability. There is very little content here. This seems to be "puffed." Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 14:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there does seem to be plenty of WP:OR. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 14:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, also half the article is off-topic and most of the rest is original research.Northwestgnome (talk) 14:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Cosprings (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Off topic fluff. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable. Ward3001 (talk) 01:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.