Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chic Management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Chic Management[edit]
- Chic Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since May, still no substantial third-party reliable sources. ~YellowFives 16:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Per nomination
ContinueWithCaution (talk) 17:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete it fails WP:N. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 01:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —ApprenticeFan talk contribs 01:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Inmate 5317 (talk) 22:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.