Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiara Magni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chiara Magni[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Technical nomination because Vexations (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) tagged the article for AfD using Twinkle but did not complete the process. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete non-notable artist sourced entirely to the normal "paid package" of black hat SEO sources. Yahoo is just a press release, the others are interviews and it's pretty telling that there are no interviews in actual rs. Fails GNG, NARTIST and whatever else she claims to be. Praxidicae (talk) 14:54, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources are all interviews or PR fluff, no independent sources found. --Finngall ^talk 15:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the first source is published ion Yahoo.com but is actually an Accesswire press release claiming that she is among the top ten something or others in the world. Sourcing is inadequate, and much of it seems to be self-generated in one way or another (e.g. own site, medium.com). ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ThatMontrealIP, it's even better: The source for Acceswire is Authority Titans, who we know as Dillon Kivo (look him up) and https://authoritytitans.com/, per their FAQ say: "We can get you on major publications such as Forbes, Yahoo, MSNBC, Wikipedia, and more. We guarantee that all of our publications are very credible, trusted, sources." This is paid-for promotion by a UPE. If they aren't already, block/ban these people and delete/salt their spam. Vexations (talk) 21:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "she's a Impressionism Fingerpainting"? no, just no. "She's one of the fastest growing artists of our times", I don't think so. No SIGCOV in reliable sources. Fails WP:ARTIST, WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:BIO. Netherzone (talk) 22:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there are no independant sources, just PR based ones. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing all four criteria of WP:ARTIST. Only reliable source is News12 which does have editorial oversight but doesn't mention any major exhibits or awards that would make her qualifications even coming close. Yahoo finance gives her one paragraph among nine other artists. Blue Riband► 15:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blue Riband, The news12 source says: "Information contained on this page is provided by an independent third-party content provider Frankly and this Site make no warranties or representations in connection therewith." Vexations (talk) 15:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

-Thank you for the alert Vexations. While I did look at the references in the article I made the mistake of assuming a cable news organization would do some journalistic fact checking. I'll be more careful going forward. Blue Riband► 15:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.