Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chi Naphsj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chi Naphsj[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a martial art whose secrets are "known by only five people in the world." No independent sources cited, and I find none. Contested PROD. Fails WP:V and WP:N. JohnCD (talk) 17:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —JohnCD (talk) 18:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Maybe it's not a WP:NFT, though it manages to look a decent bit like one. I'll call it a WP:CB and would delete it as unverifiable- as almost all "secret knowledge" would be. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 20:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Many reasons: 1.) Probably a hoax. 2.) If only 5 people know it (and it's a "secret"), it's quite unverifiable. 3.) Only 4 Google hits, all pertaining to Wikipedia, makes me pretty confident that it is not significant enough to confer notability (or, as previously mentioned, a hoax). Cocytus [»talk«] 20:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as being completely unverifiable and non-notable. KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Hoax or made up. Joe Chill (talk) 21:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not verifiable. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.