Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheyenne Rides Again
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nom. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 12:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cheyenne Rides Again[edit]
- Cheyenne Rides Again (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be a notable film. The reviews provided are not reliable sources: an AllRovi summary, and an Amazon.com review, which I have since removed. IMDB gives no external critic reviews. Not discussed in detail in any books or news sources, either; they both seem to be schedules. Fails WP:NFILM. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 17:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 17:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 17:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Comment: Seriously, Taylor? Delete an article on a 76-year-old, pre-WWII film, with many notables attached, simply because of the current article needs more sources? We can certainly expect difficulties in finding online archives of 76-year-old film reviews, but it is written of in books as part of the formative career of many different actors, and notability is not temporary. Let's look at possibilities and see how information about this film article might be kept to preserve our American cinematic history. Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.