Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chewy: Esc from F5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 21:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chewy: Esc from F5[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

video game that has not garnered significant coverage from reliable sources per WP:GNG. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The MobyGames page linked as a source in the article ([1]) contains 3 German game magazine review scores (PC Games, PowerPlay and PC Gamer), here is a scan of one of them on another site: [2]. As with all games of this age, the reviews are mainly from magazines not the internet and they are rarely easily accessable, it doesn't mean that they're not there though. MarvellousMeatpuppet (talk) 23:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as creator. MarvellousMeatpuppet pretty much said it all.--Coin945 (talk) 02:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Game has a variety of reviews means its upto some extent notable.. ARK (talk) 08:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.