Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chevelle demo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Chevelle demo[edit]
- Chevelle demo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Demos are generally not notable. No significant coverage provided or found. Prod more or less disputed (see article talk page). SummerPhD (talk) 03:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete, keep if any sources pop up. Doc Quintana (talk) 07:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 13:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nothing that can't or shouldn't already be covered in Point No. 1. No claim for notability and completely lacks sources. You would need some solid sources for me to reconsider. kiac. (talk-contrib) 14:16, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The best I could find for a reliable source is a passing mention in a 411mania.com write-up on the band, not exactly what I'd call "in-depth" coverage for the demo. There does not appear to be enough significant coverage for this to satisfy WP:NALBUMS. As others mentioned, I will consider keeping if other, better sources turn up. Gongshow Talk 18:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Demos are generally not notable. Mandsford (talk) 19:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.