Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chetan Cheenu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chetan Cheenu[edit]

Chetan Cheenu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor, minor roles in (usually) non-notable films. Fails WP:NACTOR. Yintan  18:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Subject lacks notability. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep: Sources as identifies in the article are: [1] and [2]. Both are independant, secondary sources which I consider enough to pass WP:BASIC. They arn't just passing mentions - they are wholly about the person in question. I don't consier them to be promotional or affiliated with him. Failure at WP:NACTOR is not enough for a delete !vote - it is overridden by the WP:GNG. The sources are far from comprehensive, but I do feel they are enough to esablish notability in this case. TheMagikCow (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. trivial interviews-- and the other sources are even less usable. DGG ( talk ) 10:12, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.