Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Donegan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheryl Donegan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't sufficiently meet the WP:N/WP:GNG criteria for inclusion for artists. ColonelHenry (talk) 08:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep And why is that? Numerous exhibitions, multiple independent sources. - Altenmann >t 08:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Altenmann. This is a wave of AfDs and other poor page edits done by this user. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:49, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:49, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:49, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep The artist is represented in the collection of MoMA. Michiel Duvekot (talk)|(contribs) 20:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above...Modernist (talk) 11:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.