Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherprang Areekul (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cherprang Areekul[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A previous AfD was closed as Keep, citing that notability is not an issue as the coverage of the individual in local news are sufficient to establish that the person is notable. However, the coverage in the media as an interview is not sufficient to demonstrate the notability. Notability guidelines about musicians provides that the article about subject talking about itself cannot be used as a source to determine the notability of the subject. The AfD in Thai Wikipedia also closed with redirect as the work of Cherprang alone is not sufficiently merit her own article. Harley Hartwell (talk) 10:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:19, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:19, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Citing what happen at Thai wikipedia is not a reason for deletion, which I think it's too slow to react to notability over there. She got regular news coverage from top-tier news source, related or unrelated to the band, and lots of those she appeared alone in the news piece, easily satisfies GNG. Google news search of her: [1] --Lerdsuwa (talk) 15:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - normally a member of a band is redirected to the article on the band per WP:NBAND, however, she has a major role in a film, and with significant individual coverage, she has enough notability to satisfy WP:GNG for her own article. Hzh (talk) 22:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 11:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep multiple significant individual coverage and film lead shows independent notability and passes WP:Basic, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – per comments above. Seems notable. Interqwark ^{talk contribs} 05:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Her notability is established and warrants a stand-alone article per every applicable policy. --Miwako Sato (talk) 12:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.