Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen bottom mine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chen bottom mine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assert of notability Amisom (talk) 18:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article "China's undersea sentries" in Undersea Warfare magazine published by the US Navy and this article, while not actually saying an awful lot about the mines, makes it clear that the Chen series of mines are an important part of the Chinese arsenal. For certain they will be covered in Jane's publications. These are not available online, but I would be astonished if there was not substantial material in either Jane's Mines and Mine Clearance or Jane's Naval Weapons Systems (edit: or Jane's Underwater Warfare Systems). There are bound to be Chinese language sources too. SpinningSpark 21:20, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 02:45, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:49, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep And see WP:ARTN as to why this is an invalid nomination. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per policy and Spinningspark. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.