Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheltenham Town Football Club 50 Greats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 28bytes (talk) 19:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheltenham Town Football Club 50 Greats[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. Also the content of the article is probably a copyvio of a published list. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Half the players on there aren't notable, and the only real coverage of the book at all comes from Gloucestershire-based newspapers. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:39, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:39, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:39, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per Luke, no indication of significant widespread coverage on this book. Fenix down (talk) 09:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 13:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – absence of independent significant coverage on the topic, title also seems to have a NPOV issue ;) C 679 13:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.