Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea Gladden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea Gladden[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO with a lack of substantial/independent sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination. This autobiography satisfies WP:G5 as a creation of a blocked user. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:Article is already stub and doesn't pass gng also g5 was declined so I think this nomination should stay. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 00:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Advertising, and California. Skynxnex (talk) 04:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not seeing any SIGCOV for the subject.-KH-1 (talk) 05:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. CV-style page created by a user blocked for spam. She's all in web-search, btw, but WP:PRIMARY dominate. Suitskvarts (talk) 05:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nominator. DarkHorseMayehm (talk) 00:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.