Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chei Mi Lane (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chei Mi Lane[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable person / non-notable author - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Previous AFD in 2006 closed as no consensus -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 08:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as although I found a few links at Books and Highbeam, there's nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches did not turn up enough to show they meet the notability requirements of WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. She wrote a book. That's about it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:NAUTHOR, even her book on Wong probably wouldn't squeak over the line.Coolabahapple (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.