Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Check-Out

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Check-Out

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced entirely. Article topic is adequately covered in List of The Price Is Right pricing games article.

This AFD follows same reasons for deletion as listed in the following debates for similar articles:

Sottolacqua (talk) 22:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all or redirect and lock. Never mind that these were all bundle-AFDed not too long ago, they still do not meet WP:N in that none have been explicitly written about in detail, and the entire content is unsourced trivia cribbed from golden-road.net. If anyone says that these are salvageable, the burden of proof is on him or her. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Definite delete all - Price is right games do not need their own articles, as tempting as it might be to create. Shadowjams (talk) 11:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.