Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Che: Chapter 127

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Che: Chapter 127[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Full disclosure, I'm actually the original creator here, a decade ago when our notability criteria for bands were much looser than they are now (having one track on a notable compilation album was once sufficient in and of itself) and sourcing didn't have to be demonstrated anywhere near as extensively as it does now (the fact of having a primary source webpage was, in and of itself, very often enough to get the article kept even if it was never enough to make the article GA or FA.) But by the WP:NMUSIC and WP:RS standards that apply in 2016, there's just not enough notability here anymore, and not enough reliable source coverage about them to actually support an article — and even their own primary source website has since been cybersquatted. Bearcat (talk) 14:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Bearcat. So sorry about the cybersquatting. That bit really got me. SW3 5DL (talk) 02:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It's pretty evident that these guys don't meet the guidelines for inclusion at WP:BAND or WP:N. — sparklism ^hey! 09:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.