Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chase Owen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 10:27, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chase Owen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find significant coverage from independent sources. Even WP:ROUTINE coverage seems extremely limited, with a sole mention in a Motorsport.com article and a paragraph in an Autosport article. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 06:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 06:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 06:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 06:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:ROUTINE coverage with little WP:POTENTIAL of ever meeting GNG. -"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 17:34, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per comments above. Sources in the article are mostly primary and certainly not independent. Subject was covered by some Motorsport Network outlets and Speedcafe but as mentioned above it's fairly routine and certainly doesn't convince me of the subject's notability. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 04:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the Speedcafe coverage was just a reprint of a press release either from the competitor or the series they were competing in, and thus doesn't really count towards notability. I may be wrong though. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 08:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.